Explores the scientific and social factors that continue to influence the public's lingering uncertainty over how disease can-and cannot-be spread.

Late in the summer of 1880, a wave of odors enveloped large portions of Paris. As the stench lingered, outraged residents feared that the foul air would breed an epidemic. Fifteen years later-when the City of Light was in the grips of another Great Stink-the public conversation about health and disease had changed dramatically. Parisians held their noses and protested, but this time few feared that the odors would spread disease.

Historian David S. Barnes examines the birth of a new microbe-centered science of public health during the 1880s and 1890s, when the germ theory of disease burst into public consciousness. Tracing a series of developments in French science, medicine, politics, and culture, Barnes reveals how the science and practice of public health changed during the heyday of the Bacteriological Revolution.

Despite its many innovations, however, the new science of germs did not entirely sweep away the older "sanitarian" view of public health. The longstanding conviction that disease could be traced to filthy people, places, and substances remained strong, even as it was translated into the language of bacteriology. Ultimately, the attitudes of physicians and the French public were shaped by political struggles between republicans and the clergy, by aggressive efforts to educate and "civilize" the peasantry, and by long-term shifts in the public's ability to tolerate the odor of bodily substances.

Explores the scientific and social factors that continue to influence the public's lingering uncertainty over how disease can-and cannot-be spread.

About the Author

David S. Barnes is an associate professor of the history and sociology of science at the University of Pennsylvania.

Reviews
Barnes's detailed and scholarly account is persuasive.
-Science
A well-developed study in medically related social history, it tells an intriguing tale and prompts us to ask how our own cultural contexts affect our views and actions regarding environmental and infectious scourges here and now.
-New England Journal of Medicine
Both a captivating story and a sophisticated historical study. Kudos to Barnes for this valuable and insightful book that both physicians and historians will enjoy.
-Journal of the American Medical Association
Exemplary study . . . The argument of this book rests on an interesting amalgam of insights from critical theorists and social scientists.
-Journal of the History of Medicine
The book's relevance to modern-day medical concerns will make it appealing to nurses, public health experts, and medical professionals in general.
-Nursing History Review
A remarkable contribution to the field of nineteenth-century studies.
-Dalhousie French Studies
A very worthy addition.
-Isis
David Barnes wallows in filth to very good purpose . . . The Great Stink of Paris demonstrates in exemplary fashion the value of complicating medical-historical issues by lifting our vision above ideological and narrowly social concerns so as to explore the broader cultural context of medical ideas and practices.
-H-France
Intelligent and beautifully argued.
-Historical Studies in the Natural Sciences
Barnes does a splendid job of depicting public anxieties about the stench that overwhelmed Parisians in 1880, and of tracing the campaign by government officials and physicians to respond to these concerns during the following two decades. His book makes an important contribution to both urban history and medical history through its recalibration of the history of public health.
-French Politics, Culture & Society
Useful.
-Sharon Marcus, American Historical Review



Book Information
ISBN 9781421425658
Author David S. Barnes
Format Paperback
Page Count 328
Imprint Johns Hopkins University Press
Publisher Johns Hopkins University Press
Weight(grams) 431g
Dimensions(mm) 229mm * 152mm * 22mm