Description
John Sorabji examines the theoretical underpinnings of the Woolf and Jackson reforms to the English and Welsh civil justice system. He discusses how the Woolf reforms attempted, and failed, to effect a revolutionary change to the theory of justice that informed how the system operated. It elucidates the nature of those reforms, which through introducing proportionality via an explicit overriding objective into the Civil Procedure Rules, downgraded the court's historic commitment to achieving substantive justice or justice on the merits. In doing so, Woolf's new theory is compared with one developed by Bentham, while also exploring why a similarly fundamental reform carried out in the 1870s succeeded where Woolf's failed. It finally proposes an approach that could be taken by the courts following implementation of the Jackson reforms to ensure that they succeed in their aim of reducing litigation cost through properly implementing Woolf's new theory of justice.
A critical examination of the theoretical underpinnings of the Woolf and Jackson reforms to the English and Welsh civil justice system.
About the Author
John Sorabji is a practising barrister and also the current legal secretary to the Master of the Rolls, to whom he provides advice on a wide range of subjects and specifically the English civil justice system's development. Since 2012 he has taught University College London's LLM course on Principles of Civil Justice.
Reviews
'The significance and originality of the work lies in the success of Sorabji's jurisprudential project - to place the reforms of Woolf and Jackson in the wider context of theories of justice and, in particular, to identify structural similarities between Lord Woolf's vision and the prescient writings of Jeremy Bentham.' Richard Susskind, The Times
'... a polished, sophisticated, challenging, and important study. It will enrich all courses on civil justice where the professor or student dares to ask: 'what are these rules for; and how should they be implemented?'.' Neil Andrews, International Journal of Procedural Law
Book Information
ISBN 9781107051669
Author John Sorabji
Format Hardback
Page Count 284
Imprint Cambridge University Press
Publisher Cambridge University Press
Weight(grams) 550g
Dimensions(mm) 229mm * 152mm * 17mm
A critical examination of the theoretical underpinnings of the Woolf and Jackson reforms to the English and Welsh civil justice system.
About the Author
John Sorabji is a practising barrister and also the current legal secretary to the Master of the Rolls, to whom he provides advice on a wide range of subjects and specifically the English civil justice system's development. Since 2012 he has taught University College London's LLM course on Principles of Civil Justice.
Reviews
'The significance and originality of the work lies in the success of Sorabji's jurisprudential project - to place the reforms of Woolf and Jackson in the wider context of theories of justice and, in particular, to identify structural similarities between Lord Woolf's vision and the prescient writings of Jeremy Bentham.' Richard Susskind, The Times
'... a polished, sophisticated, challenging, and important study. It will enrich all courses on civil justice where the professor or student dares to ask: 'what are these rules for; and how should they be implemented?'.' Neil Andrews, International Journal of Procedural Law
Book Information
ISBN 9781107051669
Author John Sorabji
Format Hardback
Page Count 284
Imprint Cambridge University Press
Publisher Cambridge University Press
Weight(grams) 550g
Dimensions(mm) 229mm * 152mm * 17mm
