Between 1905 and 1913, French physicist Jean Perrin's experiments on Brownian motion ostensibly put a definitive end to the long debate regarding the real existence of molecules, proving the atomic theory of matter. While Perrin's results had a significant impact at the time, later examination of his experiments questioned whether he really gained experimental access to the molecular realm. The experiments were successful in determining the mean kinetic energy of the granules of Brownian motion; however, the values for molecular magnitudes Perrin inferred from them simply presupposed that the granule mean kinetic energy was the same as the mean molecular kinetic energy in the fluid in which the granules move. This stipulation became increasingly questionable in the years between 1908 and 1913, as significantly lower values for these magnitudes were obtained from other experimental results like alpha-particle emissions, ionization, and Planck's blackbody radiation equation. In this case study in the history and philosophy of science, George E. Smith and Raghav Seth here argue that despite doubts, Perrin's measurements were nevertheless exemplars of theory-mediated measurement-the practice of obtaining values for an inaccessible quantity by inferring them from an accessible proxy via theoretical relationships between them. They argue that it was actually Perrin more than any of his contemporaries who championed this approach during the years in question. The practice of theory-mediated measurement in physics had a long history before 1900, but the concerted efforts of Perrin, Rutherford, Millikan, Planck, and their colleagues led to the central role this form of evidence has had in microphysical research ever since. Seth and Smith's study thus replaces an untenable legend with an account that is not only tenable, but more instructive about what the evidence did and did not show.

About the Author
George E. Smith joined the Philosophy Department of Tufts University in 1977. He specializes in the critical assessment of evidence in the physical sciences especially during historical transitions in which areas of research go from struggling to extract high quality evidence out of data to becoming exceptionally effective in doing so. He served as Acting Director of the Dibner Institute for the History of Science and Technology at MIT from 2001 until 2006 and has twice been a Distinguished Visiting Professor in the Philosophy Department of Stanford University. Raghav Seth graduated from Tufts University in 2012 with a B.A. in Philosophy. After college, he worked as a research assistant at the McGovern Institute for Brain Research at MIT and then as an EMT in Essex County before transitioning to medical school at the Tufts University School of Medicine from which he graduated in 2018. He is currently an anesthesiology resident at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center.

Reviews
Any philosopher hitherto who wishes to take a stand on the relevance of Perrin's studies to the debate about realism will need to take heed of the findings here. All of the publications on the matter that preceded its publication will need to be reconsidered, my own included. * Alan Chalmers, Philosophy of Science *
...an exceptional study... * Enric Perez, Metascience *
...excellent...Summing Up: Recommended. Graduate students, faculty, and professionals. * F. Potter, CHOICE *



Book Information
ISBN 9780190098025
Author George E. Smith
Format Hardback
Page Count 468
Imprint Oxford University Press Inc
Publisher Oxford University Press Inc
Weight(grams) 771g
Dimensions(mm) 160mm * 236mm * 41mm